Andreas Jungherr
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Publications
    • Digital Transformations of the Public Arena (2022)
    • Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy (2020)
    • Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data (2015)
    • Das Internet in Wahlkämpfen: Konzepte, Wirkungen und Kampagnenfunktionen (2013)
  • Podcast: Tech and Politics
  • Media
  • Teaching
  • Impressum
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Publications
    • Digital Transformations of the Public Arena (2022)
    • Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy (2020)
    • Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data (2015)
    • Das Internet in Wahlkämpfen: Konzepte, Wirkungen und Kampagnenfunktionen (2013)
  • Podcast: Tech and Politics
  • Media
  • Teaching
  • Impressum
28 Feb 2014
Andreas Jungherr Publications
2014/02/28 Andreas Jungherr

New Publication: Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review

The growing use of Twitter during election and issue campaigns by politicians, campaigners and the public alike has led to an ever increasing body of research on this topic. While a majority of studies focuses on political uses of Twitter in the USA, there is an ever growing literature on political uses of Twitter in other countries. Still, there remain challenges. Researchers from many different fields are addressing questions related to Twitter’s role in politics–such as political scientists, communication scholars or computer scientists. These researchers approach the topic from different perspectives with widely divergent methods and publish their results in venues of their various fields. This leads to a fragmentation of the field, with studies seldom addressing most of the available evidence. As of now, there is no coherent account of the existing literature. Such an account would enable researchers to develop hypotheses for their research based on empirical findings of past research. In the working paper Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review, I present an attempt at such an account. I will briefly present a large selection of studies addressing the use of Twitter by politicians, various publics during election and issue campaigns and reactions on Twitter by various actors to big mediated campaign events–such as televised candidate debates, party conventions or election day coverage.

While an ever increasing number of studies addresses the role of Twitter in politics, this research is fragmented and, more often than not, only partially connected to available research on the same topic. This could be because the research area is rather new. So, as of now, there has not yet emerged a common canon of studies, identified as relevant by the community of researchers working on the topic. Also, scholars have spent little effort in systematically identifying common empirical patterns in various studies addressing the topic and thereby not provided the field with a list of phenomena and patterns that are to be expected when researching this topic. Another reason could be the diversity of the field. Researchers from many different scientific fields are working on the role of Twitter in politics. Political scientists, communication scholars and computer scientists have published on this topic. These publications come from different theoretical perspectives, use different methods and–probably most importantly–are published in different venues. These differences make it difficult for researchers to productively engage with relevant work in their area of interest stemming from other scientific backgrounds. This leads to a rich but only loosely interconnected body of evidence on the use of Twitter in politics. With this literature review, I wish to address this problem and to offer an account of the common findings and divergent evidence that can be found on the role of Twitter in politics if one pools the available research.

In this literature review, I tried to include as many studies as possible that provided some empirical evidence on the use of Twitter in politics. In the selection of the studies, I consciously aimed to include all available studies that contained some empirical evidence on the topics of interest. In doing this, I did not just focus on studies published in scholarly journals, conference proceedings and books but also included–if available–unpublished manuscripts of conference talks or working papers. This increased the evidence available to be presented here. As this is a rather new research field, I thought it more beneficial for the goals of the study to include as much empirical evidence as possible without restricting myself to scholarly vetted publications.

I will present studies included in this review with regard to their research questions, their research design, their mode of data collection, data selection and findings. I did not critique the studies included, be it with regard to their data collection, analytical approaches or the interpretation of their findings. Instead, my aim was to compile a collection of empirical evidence that might allow for the detection of patterns common across different studies and interesting observations, that were only evident in specific cases.

While the selection criteria for the inclusion of studies in this review were rather broad with regard to the form of publication, I purposefully restricted the studies based on the topics addressed by them. I only included studies that directly or indirectly spoke to the use of Twitter by politicians and campaigns, the use of Twitter by publics during election or issue campaigns and the use of Twitter by various users to comment on mediated campaign events–such as televised candidate debates, party conventions or election day coverage.

I discussed the studies included in the review based on common features–be it the theoretical discourses addressed by them, the chosen research designs, approaches to data collection and selection on Twitter or their research questions. Table 1 shows the categories and subcategories that I used to group the studies. For each of this categories I presented a short discussion in which I emphasise common elements, divergent evidence and challenges for further research.

Categories for the discussion of studies on the use of Twitter in politics

Categories for the discussion of studies on the use of Twitter in politics

I hope this literature review stands at the beginning of a more systematic approach to the discussion of uses of Twitter in politics. Please let me know what you think.

Andreas Jungherr. 2014. Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Working Paper (February 27, 2014). Available from Social Science Research Network (SSRN).

Campaigning, Computational Social Science, Microblogging, Online Campaigning, Political Communication, Political Science, Social Media, Social Science, Twitter, Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review
  • Recent Posts

    • New working paper: What do people expect from Artificial Intelligence? Public opinion on alignment in AI moderation from Germany and the United States
    • Neuer Kurs: Forschungsprojekt in der Computational Social Science
    • New Course: Misinformation, disinformation and other digital fakery (Summer 2025)
    • New Course: Artificial Intelligence and Democracy (Summer 2025)
    • Interview zu übertriebenen Ängsten vor Desinformation und digitaler Regulierungslust
  • Categories

    • Conferences
    • Interviews
    • Lecture Podcast
    • News
    • Notes
    • Public Speaking
    • Publications
    • Teaching
    • Videos
  • Archives

    • May 2025 (1)
    • April 2025 (3)
    • March 2025 (3)
    • February 2025 (7)
    • January 2025 (3)
    • November 2024 (4)
    • September 2024 (1)
    • July 2024 (2)
    • June 2024 (5)
    • April 2024 (4)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • January 2024 (1)
    • December 2023 (1)
    • November 2023 (1)
    • July 2023 (2)
    • June 2023 (1)
    • April 2023 (1)
    • March 2023 (1)
    • February 2023 (2)
    • December 2022 (1)
    • November 2022 (1)
    • October 2022 (3)
    • July 2022 (1)
    • June 2022 (4)
    • May 2022 (2)
    • April 2022 (1)
    • February 2022 (1)
    • January 2022 (2)
    • December 2021 (3)
    • November 2021 (1)
    • October 2021 (2)
    • September 2021 (3)
    • July 2021 (1)
    • June 2021 (4)
    • April 2021 (3)
    • March 2021 (2)
    • January 2021 (1)
    • December 2020 (1)
    • November 2020 (2)
    • October 2020 (2)
    • September 2020 (1)
    • July 2020 (1)
    • June 2020 (1)
    • April 2020 (5)
    • March 2020 (2)
    • February 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (4)
    • November 2019 (1)
    • October 2019 (2)
    • September 2019 (1)
    • July 2019 (1)
    • April 2019 (3)
    • January 2019 (1)
    • November 2018 (1)
    • September 2018 (2)
    • March 2018 (1)
    • February 2018 (1)
    • December 2017 (1)
    • October 2017 (1)
    • September 2017 (1)
    • July 2017 (2)
    • June 2017 (1)
    • May 2017 (3)
    • April 2017 (2)
    • March 2017 (2)
    • January 2017 (2)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (17)
    • July 2016 (11)
    • June 2016 (1)
    • March 2016 (1)
    • February 2016 (2)
    • January 2016 (1)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (1)
    • September 2015 (3)
    • May 2015 (1)
    • April 2015 (3)
    • March 2015 (3)
    • February 2015 (3)
    • January 2015 (1)
    • October 2014 (2)
    • August 2014 (2)
    • April 2014 (1)
    • March 2014 (1)
    • February 2014 (2)
    • December 2013 (1)
    • October 2013 (3)
    • September 2013 (3)
    • August 2013 (4)
    • July 2013 (3)
    • June 2013 (2)
    • May 2013 (1)
    • April 2013 (1)
    • March 2013 (1)
    • February 2013 (1)
    • December 2012 (1)
    • November 2012 (2)
    • October 2012 (3)
    • September 2012 (3)
    • August 2012 (2)
    • June 2012 (1)
    • April 2012 (8)
    • March 2012 (1)
    • February 2012 (1)
    • October 2011 (2)
    • September 2011 (1)
    • August 2011 (1)
    • July 2011 (5)
    • June 2011 (2)
    • May 2011 (4)
    • April 2011 (1)
    • March 2011 (2)
    • February 2011 (3)
    • January 2011 (2)
    • December 2010 (3)
    • November 2010 (1)
    • October 2010 (1)
    • September 2010 (3)
    • July 2010 (1)
    • June 2010 (2)
    • May 2010 (1)
    • April 2010 (4)
    • March 2010 (3)
    • February 2010 (6)
    • January 2010 (1)
    • December 2009 (3)
    • August 2009 (1)
    • April 2009 (1)
    • March 2009 (3)
    • January 2009 (2)
    • December 2008 (3)
    • November 2008 (3)
    • October 2008 (9)
    • August 2008 (1)
  • On the web

    • instagram
    • linkedin
    • xing
    • youtube
  • Navigation

    • Home
    • About
    • Blog
    • Publications
      • Digital Transformations of the Public Arena (2022)
      • Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy (2020)
      • Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data (2015)
      • Das Internet in Wahlkämpfen: Konzepte, Wirkungen und Kampagnenfunktionen (2013)
    • Podcast: Tech and Politics
    • Media
    • Teaching
    • Impressum
  • Contact

    • Feldkirchenstraße 21
      96052 Bamberg, Germany

    • https://andreasjungherr.net/https://andreasjungherr.net/
    • andreas.jungherr[at]uni-bamberg.de
Andreas Jungherr POWERED BY United Themes™