What's new?

Read Blog

The Shelves of my Quantum Library

A few days ago @zenpundit wrote on his blog about the concept of the quantum library. Jay@Soob has tracked this idea back to a posting on The Innovationist blog. Here a quantum library is defined as containing

the layer that co-exists as a member of both the Library and the Anti-Library. It is something you may have read, but when read again with a different perspective it exists in another form. These type’s of books are the ultimate for a bibliophile. It is the layer described above and contains the texts that you re-read.

Since a former project by @zenpundit and Soob regarding the antilibrary proved to be great fun, I started to think about my quantum library. So, after careful consideration, here are the books that qualify for the shelves of my quantum library:

Niccolò Machiavelli: Il Principe For a political scientist with a focus on the dos and don’ts of practical political leadership, this is an embarrassingly obvious choice. Machiavelli’s short text proves different each time around. It was a different book after I visited Firenze, I read it differently after I worked on a political campaign and when I reread it in preparation for my thesis I found yet another text. Now I am waiting for its next incarnation.

Michel de Montaigne: Essays Montaigne is the grand seigneur of all the men of letters. Locking himself away from the world and writing his multi-volume essays was in itself stuff of legends. The scope of his work guarantees different discoveries each time one opens the meanwhile well worn pages.

Jorge Luis Borges: Ficciones and El Aleph Borges’ short stories are always rewarding but I find myself regularly revisiting his stories “The Immortal” and “The Babylon Lottery“. Always rich and always different.

Golo Mann: Wallenstein This incredibly detailed narrative of Wallensteins life and time tells of a man of action who in a time of manic change chose the vita activa. Like all great biographies this account of an active life changes its meaning to the reader with personal experience of battles won and battles lost.

Umberto Eco: Il pendolo di Foucault The first time I read Eco’s Pendulum I read it as a thriller of ideas. Only the second time I found it to be one of the greatest parables on the profession of historians. The permanent rewriting of history from the perspective of an ever advancing present has in all its grotesque splendor been seldom portrayed so accurately and so entertaining.

What would one find on the shelves of your quantum library?

The Shelves of my Antilibrary

In June, on a previous incarnation of this blog, I wrote about my antilibrary. Since meanwhile the concept of the quantum library makes the rounds I decided to reblog my antilibrary post as a preparation for the libraries to come. If you already read this please bear with me and wait for the shelves to come.

In his great book “The Black Swan“? Nassim Nicholas Taleb introduces the concept of an antilibrary:

The writer Umberto Eco belongs to that small class of scholars who are encyclopedic, insightful, and nondull. He is the owner of a large personal library (containing thirty thousand books), and separates visitors into two categories: those who react with “Wow! Signore professore dottore Eco, what a library you have! How many of these books have you read?” and others – a very small minority- who get the point that a private library is not an ego boosting appendage but a research tool. Read books are far less valuable than unread ones. The library should contain as much of what you do not know as your financial means, mortgage rates, and the currently tight real estate market allow you to put there. You will accumulate more knowledge and more books as you grow older, and the growing number of unread books on the shelves will look at you menacingly. Indeed, the more you know, the larger the rows of unread books. Let us call the collection of unread books an antilibrary.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: “The Black Swan”? 2007: p. 1.

The blogosphere has picked up on the antilibrary starting with the viral post “What is in your Antilibrary?“? by Münzenberg. I found this post via the blog zenpundit by @zenpundit. This made me look at my own shelves. So what books are in my antilibrary?

Through the work on my thesis I started to get more interested in the scientific process of the social sciences. Especially the divide between the formalistic and the hermeneutic approach to the enquiry into social phenomena seems fascinating to me. Therefor the books in my antilibrary show that interest:

Jon Elster: Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. A great introduction into the basic concepts of social sciences. What are social sciences? What are valid questions that social scientists are able to answer? What is in the methodological toolkit of a social scientist?

Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic and Amos Tversky: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. And: Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin and Daniel Kahneman: Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Two great collections of articles dealing with human decisionmaking. A constant reminder how great social science looks like.

Hans-Georg Gadamer: Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. One of the foundations for the 20th century school of hermeneutics. What are the boundaries of analytical methods for the analysis of social phenomena? What can we gain in understanding through the hermeneutic circle?

Michael Mann: The Sources of Social Power. One of the most ambitious academic projects of modern sociology. What are the constants in the organization of human societies? How is power distributed in societies?

Which books are on the shelves of your antilibrary?

5 Movies with Paul Newman

The Long, Hot Summer (1958) because of the lady who has to buy herself a bus ticket, because of the man with whom nobody wants to talk peacable, and because of the man who wonders what happens when he is dead.

The Hustler (1961) because of the man who does not now how he can lose, because you play pool fast and loose but also because character beats talent.

The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1972) because people dress up when they go to see Miss Lilly, because of a drunken bear and the justice who is the handmaiden of the law. Now get a rope!

Slap Shot (1977) because for two minutes in the box you feel shame and then you get free, because you can’t put a bounty on a man’s head, and because well, we are human beings.

The Verdict (1982) because there is no other case!

5 Movies by David Mamet

The Spanish Prisoner (1997) because of the girl who lives above a bakery, the sunshine bakery.

The Winslow Boy (1999) because of the man who knows so little about women, the woman who knows so little about men and because one reads Lord Byron.

State and Main (2000) because everybody makes their own fun, else it be entertainment.

Heist (2001) because the place to be is in the sun.

Redbelt (2008) because there’s always an escape.

5 Filme von François Truffaut

Truffaut in Zurich

Baisers volés (1968) für Claude Jade, Delphine Seyrig und eine umgestossene Tasse Kaffee.

La sirène du Mississipi (1969) für La Reunion, eine zerbrochene Schallplatte und Schönheit die schmerzt.

Les deux anglaises et le continent (1971) für Kika Markham, gesprochene Briefe und Balzac.

La nuit américaine (1973) für die Musik von Georges Delerue, künstlichen Schnee und einen Zug in der Nacht.

La chambre verte (1978) für Truffaut, Nathalie Baye und einen Brief im Winter.

Image cc Andreas Jungherr.

Modeling Small-Group Interaction on Pervasive Digital Channels: New Influence on Public Opinion

Andreas Jungherr and Pascal Jürgens (2008) “Modeling Small-Group Interaction on Pervasive Digital Channels: New Influence on Public Opinion”. Poster presented at the International Workshop on Challenges and Visions in the Social Sciences. Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland on 18-23 August.

Modeling Small Group Interaction on Pervasive Digital Channels

Modeling Small Group Interaction on Pervasive Digital Channels

In the summer of 2008 Pascal Jürgens and I presented a poster at the International Workshop on Challenges and Visions in the Social Sciences organized by Dirk Helbing, Lars-Erik Cederman, Andreas Diekmann, Frank Schweitzer and Didier Sornette. In the poster we used agent based modeling to gain some understanding into the dynamics of communication on Twitter.

In the spring of 2009 we revisited this topic in a paper which Pascal Jürgens presented at the 11th General Online Research Conference, GOR 09 in Vienna, Austria.

For a higher resolution of the poster have a look at this pdf:

Andreas Jungherr and Pascal Jürgens (2008) “Modeling Small-Group Interaction on Pervasive Digital Channels: New Influence on Public Opinion”.